C.P.I. for food and beverages up 0.3% in November

by Eric Schroeder
Share This:

WASHINGTON — The Consumer Price Index for food and beverages was 206.6 in November, up 0.3% from 206.1 in October, the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor said. On an unadjusted basis, the index was up 4.7% from November 2006. Meanwhile, the index for All Urban Consumers increased 0.6% in November, before seasonal adjustment. The November level of 210.2 was 4.3% higher than in November 2006.

On a seasonally adjusted basis, the C.P.I. increased 0.8% in November, its largest advance since a 1.2% increase in September 2005. Within the overall C.P.I., energy costs advanced 5.7%, accounting for approximately 70% of the overall C.P.I. increase. Within energy, the index for petroleum-based energy increased 9.5%, while the index for energy services rose 0.7%.

The index for food at home continued its upward climb, rising 0.3% to 204.8.

The gain in food at home was driven by a gain of 1.6% in the index for fruits and vegetables in November. The index for fresh vegetables and fresh fruits each increased 2.3%, while the index for processed fruits and vegetables decreased 0.9%.

Dairy products, which rose 0.2% in October, climbed 0.6% to 205.6. Within dairy, milk prices rose 1.2%. Since the beginning of the year, fresh milk prices have risen 23.2%, the B.L.S. said.

The index for meats, poultry, fish, and eggs was 198.2, down 0.1% from October. Beef prices increased 0.6%, but the indexes for eggs, poultry, pork, and fish and seafood all declined.

The index for cereal and bakery products rose 0.7% to 226.5, while other food at home fell 0.2% to 174.3.

The index for nonalcoholic beverages fell 0.5%.

The other two components of the food and beverage index — food away from home and alcoholic beverages — increased 0.3% and declined 0.2%, respectively, in November, the B.L.S. said.

Comment on this Article
We welcome your thoughtful comments. Please comply with our Community rules.



The views expressed in the comments section of Food Business News do not reflect those of Food Business News or its parent company, Sosland Publishing Co., Kansas City, Mo. Concern regarding a specific comment may be registered with the Editor by clicking the Report Abuse link.